← 淡水 貓腳印 AMB 店家冠軍賽

Water Ravishing MillTier 2

at 淡水 貓腳印 AMB 店家冠軍賽

decks
4 (13.3% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
17 8-7-2
overall winrate
52.9%
ELO-adjusted winrate
52.0% avg ELO +0.8 per match
expected value
49.1% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
49.9% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1368 · median 1331 · range 1319–1489 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1088 Q1 1265 Q3 1455 1536
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 23.3% 4 1-3-0 25.0% 37.5% 42.1% -5.1
Wind Razorgale 13.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.1% +14.5
Fire Aggro 10.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.6% +10.5
Fire Crux Mage 10.0% 5 3-0-2 80.0% 66.7% 58.8% +5.0
Wind Allies 10.0% 3 0-3-0 0.0% 28.6% 36.4% -10.2
Fire Astra Cleric 6.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.9% +11.1
Wind Shadowstrike 6.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.7% -5.3
Fire Arcane 3.3% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 3.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.1% +8.1
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 15 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 15 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Song of Frost +1.00 1 0 0
Fractal of Polar Depths -1.00 0 1 0
Frostbind -1.00 0 1 0
Diffusive Block -1.00 0 1 0
Vaporjet Shieldbearer +1.00 1 0 0
Revitalizing Cleanse +1.00 1 0 0
Torpid Fractal -1.00 0 1 0
Tonoris, Lone Mercenary +1.00 1 0 0
Seasprite Diver +1.00 1 0 0
Spirit of Water +1.00 1 0 0
Freezing Hail +1.00 1 0 0
Safeguard Amulet -1.00 0 1 0
Tidestone Bovine -1.00 0 1 0
Tidal Lock +1.00 1 0 0
Silvie, Wilds Whisperer -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/15239/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill